Features of Recognizing Other Person’s Cognitive Errors among Patients with Schizophrenia During the Perception of Communicative Situations

Relevance. Social cognition impairments in patients with schizophrenia complicate their interactions with others, adversely impacting daily functioning and the progression of the disease. Investigating these impairments is crucial for developing effective strategies for diagnosis, rehabilitation, and psychological intervention to improve patients’ quality of life.

Intention. To investigate the impairments in cognitive information processing in patients with schizophrenia while performing tasks focused on recognizing cognitive errors of characters in communicative situations.

Methodology. The study included 40 patients with paranoid schizophrenia (experimental group) and 60 healthy participants (control group). Participants’ eye-movement parameters during video perception and verbal interpretations of the clips during retelling to the experimenter were analyzed. Data analysis was performed using ANOVA and Student’s t-test.

Results. Patients with schizophrenia exhibited impairments in recognizing cognitive errors of characters in videos of social situations. These impairments were associated with difficulties in identifying task-relevant objects and events; monitoring characters’ perceptions; and comparing their own cognitive activity with that of the observed characters. Additionally, patients with schizophrenia used vague linguistic expressions to describe characters and struggled to identify features necessary for their unambiguous recognition by their interlocutors. These impairments were significantly more frequent in patients with severe deficit symptoms compared to healthy individuals and patients with mild deficits.

Conclusion. The findings underscore the importance of implementing psychocorrection programs at the early stages of the disorder. Interventions should focus on training patients in effective linguistic encoding of objects and developing skills for detailed analysis of communicative situations through the use of open-ended questions.

1. Klinicheskaya psikhometrika: uchebnoe posobie [Clinical psychometrics: training manual]. Ed. V.A. Soldatkina. Rostov n/D: RostGMU, 2018; 339 p. (In Russ.)

2. Lakoff Dzh. Zhenshchiny, ogon’ i opasnye veshchi: Chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii [Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind]. Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury [Languages of Slavic culture]. 2004; 792 p. (In Russ.)

3. Mirzaev A.A., Agranovskii M.L., Muminov R.K. Rol’ psikhosotsial’nykh faktorov v formirovanii pobochnykh effektov antipsikhoticheskoi terapii u bol’nykh paranoidnoi shizofreniei [The role of psychosocial factors in the formation of side effects of antipsychotic therapy in patients with paranoid schizophrenia]. Ekonomika i sotsium [Economy and society]. 2020; (8): 267–270. (In Russ.)

4. Rumyantseva E.E. Model’ psikhicheskogo (theory of mind) i neirokognitivnoe funktsionirovanie pri shizofrenii [Theory of mind and neurocognitive functioning in schizophrenia]. Klinicheskaya i spetsial’naya psikhologiya [Clinical Psychology and Special Education]. 2015; 4 (3): 77–85. (In Russ.)

5. Rychkova O.V., Kholmogorova A.B. Osnovnye teoreticheskie podkhody k issledovaniyu narushenii sotsial’nogo poznaniya pri shizofrenii: sovremennyi status i perspektivy razvitiya [The main theoretical approaches to the study of disorders of social cognition in schizophrenia: current status and prospects of development]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling psychology and psychotherapy]. 2014; 22 (4): 30–43. (In Russ.)

6. Sergienko E.A., Ulanova A.Yu., Lebedeva E.I. Model’ psikhicheskogo. Struktura i dinamika [Theory of Mind. Structure and dynamics]. Moscow, 2020; 503 p. (In Russ.)

7. Solokhina T.A., Yastrebova V.V., Mitikhin V.G., Tyumenkova G.V. Psikhosotsial’naya reabilitatsiya i psikhosotsial’noe lechenie pri shizofrenii: tseli, etapy, otsenka effektivnosti [Psychosocial rehabilitation and psychosocial treatment in schizophrenia: goals, stages, evaluation of the efectiveness]. Psikhiatriya [Psychiatry], 2019; (17(3)): 62–74. (In Russ.)

8. Tregubenko I.A., Isaeva E.R., Mukhitova Y.V., Shoshina I.I. Psihofiziologicheskij podhod k diagnostike kognitivnyh processov pri shizofrenii [Psychophysiological approach to the diagnostics of cognitive processes in schizophrenia]. Vestnik psikhoterapii [Bulletin of Рsychotherapy]. 2021; (77): 84–98. (In Russ.)

9. Khomenko N.V. Raspoznavanie emotsii i pamyat’ na litsa u patsientov s shizofreniei [Emotion recognition and face memory in patients with schizophrenia]. Psikhiatriya, psikhoterapiya i klinicheskaya psikhologiya [Psychiatry, psychotherapy and clinical psychology]. 2012; (4): 46–55. (In Russ.)

10. Goswami U. Cognitive development and cognitive neuroscience: The learning brain. Routledge. 2019; 660 p.

11. Green M.F., Horan W.P., Lee J. Social cognition in schizophrenia. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2015; 16 (10): 620–631. DOI: 10.1038/nrn4005

12. Penn D.L., Sanna L.J., Roberts D.L. Social cognition in schizophrenia: an overview. Schizophrenia bulletin, 2008; 34 (3): 408–411. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbn014

13. Premack D., Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and brain science., 1978; 1 (4): 515–526. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512

14. Stephan K. E., Friston K. J., Frith C. D. Dysconnection in schizophrenia: from abnormal synaptic plasticity to failures of self-monitoring. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2009; 35 (3): 509–527. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbn176