The problem of compliance in patients with chronic renal failure
Abstract
The article presents data from modern foreign and domestic research and analysis of scientific discussions regarding the term "compliance" (adherence) and factors affecting the level of compliance in patients with chronic renal failure. The review of modern diagnostic methods and ways to increase the level of adherence to treatment is carried out. The article substantiates the need to develop and implement diagnostic methods and improve compliance in patients at various stages of kidney transplantation.
About the Authors
Yu. S. Lysenko
Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine of N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia Sergeevna Lysenko – medical psychologist, junior researcher
B. Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
O. Yu. Mikita
Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine of N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olesya Yurievna Mikita – PhD Psychol. Sci., chief of Educational center, researcher of kidney and pancreatic transplantation department
B. Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
A. V. Pinchuk
Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine of N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey Valerevich Pinchuk – Dr. Med. Sci., Head of the Scientific Department of Kidney and Pancreatic Transplantation
B. Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
M. Sh. Khubutia
Scientific Research Institute of Emergency Medicine of N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mogeli Shalvovich Hubutia – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Dr. Med. Sci. Prof., chief transplantologist, President
B. Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
References
1. Bogatyrev N.V. Ponyatie komplajensa i problema izmereniya komplajensa [The concept of compliance and the problem of measuring compliance]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gercena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences]. 2009. N. 116. Pp. 260–265. (In Russ.)
2. Vasilyeva I. A. Kachestvo zhizni bolnyh pri lechenii gemodializom: biologicheskie i psihosocialnye faktory, metody ocenki i podhody k korrekcii [Quality of life of patients treated with hemodialysis: biological and psychosocial factors, assessment methods and approaches to correction: specialty] : Abstract Dis. … Dr. Psychol. Sci. Sankt-Peterburg. 2010. 49 р. (In Russ.)
3. Volskaya, E.A. Pacientskij komplaens. Obzor tendencij v issledovaniyah [Patient compliance. Review of research trends]. Remedium [Remedy allowance]. 2013. N 11. Pp. 6–15. (In Russ.)
4. Dannye RusTransplant [RusTransplant data]. URL: https://rustransplant.com/statistika-po-peresadke-pochki/ (In Russ.)
5. Danilov D.S. Terapevticheskoe sotrudnichestvo (komplaens): soderzhanie ponyatiya, mehanizmy formirovaniya i metody optimizacii [Therapeutic cooperation (compliance): content of the concept, mechanisms of formation and optimization methods]. Nevrologiya, nejropsihiatriya, psihosomatika. [Neurology, neuropsychiatry, psychosomatics]. 2014. N. 2. Pр. 412. (In Russ.)
6. Ievlev E.N. Kompleksnyj analiz kachestva zhizni u bol`nyh, nahodyashhihsya na programmnom gemodialize v Udmurtskoj respublike [Complex analysis of quality of life in patients undergoing program hemodialysis in the Udmurt Republic]. Nefrologiya [Nephrology]. 2015. Vol. 19, N 4. Pp. 59–66. (In Russ.)
7. Klimusheva N.F., Marshall L.T., Shmakova T.V. Psihologicheskie faktory razvitiya transplantologii [Psychological factors in the development of Transplantology]. Medicinskaya psihologiya v Rossi [Medical psychology in Russia: electron. scientific journal]. 2014. N 4 (27). (In Russ.)
8. Klimusheva N.F. Psihologicheskie faktory razvitiya transplantologii [Psychological factors of development of Transplantology]. Medicinskaya psihologiya v Rossi [Medical psychology in Russia: electron. scientific journal]. 2014. N 4 (27). URL: http://mprj.ru/archiv_global/2014_4_27/nomer/nomer09.php (In Russ.)
9. Kadyrov R.V. Oprosnik "Uroven` komplaentnosti" ["Level of compliance"]. Vladivostok. 2014. 74 p. (In Russ.)
10. Nekotorye aspekty psihologicheskoj raboty v transplantologicheskoj sluzhbe [Some aspects of psychological work in the transplant service]. Aspirantskij vestnik Povolzhya [Postgraduate Bulletin of the Volga region]. 2014. Vol. 14, N 3–4. Pр. 142–143. (In Russ.)
11. Kremleva O.V. Problemy nonkomplajentnosti v somaticheskoj klinike: taktika preodoleniya [Problems of non-compliance in the somatic clinic: tactics of overcoming]. Medicinskaya psihologiya v Rossii [Medical psychology in Russia]. 2013. N 4 (21). URL: http://mprj.ru/archiv_global/2013_4_21/nomer/nomer11.php (In Russ.)
12. Kuvshinova N.Y. Psihosomaticheskie reakcii u bolnyh hronicheskoj pochechnoj nedostatochnostyu [Psychosomatic reactions in patients with chronic renal failure]. Materialy 1 mezhdun. nauch.-praktich. konf. «Nauka i obrazovanie» [Proceedings of the 1st international scientific and practical conference «Science and education»]. Moskva. 2014. P. 10–12. (In Russ.)
13. Kuvshinova N.Y. Problema priverzhennosti terapii v razlichnyh oblastyah mediciny [The problem of adherence to therapy in various fields of medicine]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademii nauk. [Proceedings of the Samara scientific center of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2015. Vol. 17, N 5 (3), Pp. 1014–1020. (In Russ.)
14. Mikita O.Yu. Kachestvo zhizni i smyslozhiznennye orientacii pacientov s hronicheskoj pochechnoj nedostatochnostyu do transplantacii pochki [Quality of life and life-meaning orientations of patients with chronic renal failure before kidney transplantation]. Vestnik psikhoterapii [Bulletin of Psychotherapy]. 2018. N 67 (72). Pp. 131–140. (In Russ.)
15. Mikita O.Yu. Psihologicheskij status i kachestvo zhizni pacientov s hronicheskoj pochechnoj nedostatochnostyu do i posle transplantacii pochki [Psychological status and quality of life of patients with chronic renal failure before and after kidney transplantation]. Uchenye zapiski universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta [Scientific notes of University named after P.F. Lesgaft]. 2018. № 12 (166). Pp. 326–329. (In Russ.)
16. Nikolaev N.A. Rossijskij universalnyj oprosnik kolichestvennoj ocenki priverzhennosti k lecheniyu (KOP-25) [Russian universal questionnaire for quantitative assessment of treatment adherence (COP-25)]. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya [Clinical pharmacology and therapy]. 2018. N 27 (1). Pp. 74–78. (In Russ.)
17. Nikolaev N.A. Kolichestvennaya ocenka priverzhennosti k lecheniyu v klinicheskoj medicine: protokol, procedura, interpretaciya [Quantitative assessment of adherence to treatment in clinical medicine: Protocol, procedure, interpretation]. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya praktika [High-quality clinical practice]. 2016. N 1. P. 50–54. (In Russ.)
18. Nikolskaya N.S. Osobennosti samosoznaniya bolnyh v situacii predelnogo vitalnogo riska [Features of self-awareness of patients in a situation of extreme vital risk: specialty] : Abstract Dis. … PhD Psychol. Sci. Moskva. 2012. 20 p. (In Russ.)
19. Pervyj Rossijskij konsensus po kolichestvennoj ocenke priverzhennosti k lecheniyu: osnovnye polozheniya, algoritmy i rekomendacii [The First Russian consensus on quantitative assessment of adherence to treatment: basic provisions, algorithms and recommendations]. Medicinskij vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza [Medical Bulletin of the North Caucasus]. 2018. Vol. 13, N 1–2. P. 259–271. (In Russ.)
20. Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action // World Health Organization. Geneva, 2003. 110 р. URL: https://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_report/en/
21. Bicalho P.R., Requiao-Moura L.R., Borrelli M. [et al.] Adherence to medical appointments among living kidney donors after donation under a monitored approach and long-term clinical outcomes: a Brazilian single-center cohort study. Transplant Proc. 2019. Vol. 51, N 5. Рр. 1563–1567. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.020.
22. Daniels G.B., Robinson J.R., Walker C.A. Adherence to treatment by African Americans Undergoing hemodialysis. Nephrol. Nurs J. 2018. Vol. 45, N 6. Рр. 561–568.
23. Golfieri L., Gitto S., Vukotic R. [et al.] Impact of psychosocial status on liver transplant process. Annals of Hepatology. 2019. N 18. Рр. 804–809. DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.06.011.
24. Kenawy A.S., Gheith O., Othman N. [et al.] Medication compliance and lifestyle adherence in renal transplant recipients in Kuwait. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2019. N 13. Рр. 1477–1486. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S209212.
25. Lin I.H., Wong T.C., Nien S.W. [et al.] Dietary compliance among renal transplant recipients: a single – nter study in Taiwan. Transplant Proc. 2019. Vol. 51, N 5. Рp. 1325–1330. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.026.
26. Medved V., Medved S., Skocic Hanzek M. Transplantation psychiatry: an overview. Psychiatr. Danub. 2019. Vol. 31, N 1. Pр. 18–25. DOI: 10.24869/psyd.2019.18.
27. Park S., Kim M., Kim J.E. [et al.] Characteristics of kidney transplantation recipients over time in South Korea. Korean J. Inter. Med. 2020. Vol. 35, N 6. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2019.292.
28. Sas C. The psychosocial evaluation is an essential part of the pretransplant workup for patients with end-stage renal disease: a social worker`s perspective. Health Soc.Work. 2019. Vol. 44, N. 3. P. 208–211. DOI: 10.1093/hsw/hlz012.
29. Urquhart J. How much compliance is enough? Pharm. Res. 1996. Vol. 13, N 1. P. 10–11. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016004611847.
Review
For citations:
Lysenko Yu.S., Mikita O.Yu., Pinchuk A.V., Khubutia M.Sh. The problem of compliance in patients with chronic renal failure. Bulletin of psychotherapy. 2020;1(76):109-122. (In Russ.)
Views:
12
Email this article 